US General calls Iraq war 'nightmare' Sat, 13 Oct 2007 12:04:06

Former US military chief General Ricardo Sanchez A former US military chief in Iraq has slammed the US strategy in the conflict, which he warned was "a nightmare with no end in sight". "After more than four years of fighting, America continues its desperate struggle in Iraq without any concerted effort to devise a strategy that will achieve victory in that war-torn country or in the greater conflict against extremism,' General Ricardo Sanchez said on Friday at a gathering of military reporters and editors in Arlington, Virginia. Retired Lt. Gen. Ricardo Sanchez, who commanded coalition troops for a year beginning June 2003, cast a wide net of blame for both political and military shortcomings in Iraq that helped open the way for the insurgency, such as disbanding the Saddam-era military and failing to cement ties with tribal leaders and quickly establishing a civilian government after Saddam was toppled. Gen. Sanchez also labeled US political leaders 'incompetent' and 'corrupted', saying that had they been in the military, they would have faced courts martial for dereliction of duty. SA/GM

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Eyewitness 10 News San Diego (ABC) - CNN.com - North County Times - El Latino - San Diego Union - San Diego Tribune

Media:

Pacific Law Center in California which is owned by Phillips and Associates Law Firm in Arizona and 100% backed by Solomon Ward Seidenwurm and Smith (Solomon Ward Attorneys at Law) admit on court record that they proudly defend child molesters in San Diego, California (James Dalton & Aaron Fritz) and they have every right to do so.

When ANY person(s) that gets charged in San Diego, California with this sort of crime(s) related to harming children the media exposes the case and they the media do extensive follow ups. Right?

Wrong.

I have searched all over the internet news wires from the past and current and I can not find a single news article that contains Pacific Law Center as the legal counsel for the accused of sex crimes against any child.

Why? Why is there no mention of Pacific Law Center? There must be a motive of why the local media does not mention person(s) that are charged with sex crimes against any child whom the accused is being defended by Pacific Law Center.

The answer is the $10,000,000+ that Pacific Law Center spends with the local media in advertisement.

I believe that Pacific Law Center tells the local media that if they expose their deared client(s) and Pacific Law Center as the legal council for the person(s) of being charged with sex crimes of any kind against any child then they Pacific Law Center will no longer advertise with them.

Prosecutors:

Pacific Law Center in San Diego, California which is owned by Phillips and Associates Law Firm in Arizona operates very much like a government office.

San Diego County Public Defenders Office is a government office. Every person that works for the San Diego County Public Defenders Office gets paid by a government check. We as tax payers pay for that office to operate, but we as tax payers do not have control of how much funding and support the San Diego Public Defenders Office gets. Compared to the funding and support that the San Diego County District Attorneys Office and the City of San Diego Attorneys Office it is insulting to the tax payer. Should the tax payer ever need to be represented by the San Diego County Public Defenders Office, that person will not get a fair defense due to lack of funding.

Pacific Law Center is private, and they spend over $10,000,000 a year on advertising, and Pacific Law Center has over 100 employees that get paid very well. If you look at the website of PacificLawCenter.com you will see that they only have 20 attorneys as of March 11, 2007 and some are supervisors that perhaps have even forgotten what a court room looks like. What do the other 80 employees do at Pacific Law Center? Pacific Law Center needs paralegals, investigators, a marketing department, janitors, delivery personals, limo drivers Etc…

It is a big overhead that Pacific Law Center has. Just like any business Pacific Law Center wants to save money. Operating Pacific Law Center like the San Diego County Public Defenders Office can save alot of money.

What does the San Diego County Public Defenders Office do so it can save money, while still representing the tax payer? Make deals with the prosecutor(s). It is always ONLY the prosecutors that offer the deals to the San Diego County Public Defenders Office and to any other defense attorney(s).

This is where corruption can be suggested. Why would a person hire Pacific Law Center when it can get the same results as if the accused was being represented by the San Diego County Public Defenders Office? Heavy marketing by Pacific Law Center is the reason. Misleading the public that they Pacific Law Center will get you better results from just about any other defense attorney in the State of California as a whole. This is called fraud.

The San Diego County District Attorneys Office has a fraud investigation unit which I know that they are very good at what they do, and I personally thank them for their efforts of protecting us regardless of race or gender.

The San Diego County District Attorneys Office has over 1,000 employees, and more than 250 of them are attorneys, and more than 100 of them are investigators. Because of better pay, and only because of better pay 14 investigators from the San Diego Police Department went to work for the San Diego District Attorneys Office.

San Diego County government as a whole is and has been having major problems with money due to frauds which we all see on the media. Where does the San Diego District Attorneys Office get the funds to hire 14 additional investigators when the San Diego Police Department has a difficult time with funds?

When a deal is made on a criminal matter it saves all parties money, except the defendant. If the defendant is being represented by Pacific Law Center then there is no refund on a retainer (contract). This is a major hustle that brings in alot of money, and this is called fraud.

So why wont the San Diego District Attorneys Office stop this hustle (fraud)? The motive is when Pacific Law Center talks its clients into taking just about all deals offered by the San Diego County District Attorneys Office ALL parties save money except the defendant.

If the defendant wants to take his/her criminal case to trial all parties turn their backs on the defendant, that includes Pacific Law Center and the San Diego County Public Defenders Office in a manner that is called being railroaded in jail or prison, and this is called fraud, and violations of so many things that is related to human rights violations.


Superior Court of California, County of San Diego


CENTCOMMIL.com         MI5GOVUK.com